The Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) has strongly rejected allegations contained in a recent report by the United Nations Human Rights Office claiming that Ugandan forces were involved in airstrikes in South Sudan.
Ugandan military officials described the findings as “incomplete and biased,” insisting that the report misrepresents the role of the country’s armed forces in the conflict-affected region.
Army Dismisses Allegations
Speaking on behalf of the military, Chris Magezi, the Acting Director of Defence Public Information, said the report failed to present a balanced assessment of the situation.
Magezi argued that the conclusions drawn by the UN investigators did not adequately consider the broader security context and the mandate under which Ugandan forces operate in the region.
According to the army spokesperson, Uganda remains committed to maintaining peace and stability in South Sudan and operates in line with regional and international security agreements.
UN Report Raises Concerns
The UN human rights report had suggested that foreign military involvement, including alleged participation by Ugandan forces, may have contributed to airstrikes linked to civilian harm in parts of South Sudan.
The report called for greater transparency and accountability regarding military operations in the conflict zones, particularly where civilians may have been affected.
Uganda Defends Its Role in Regional Security
Uganda has historically played a significant role in regional peace and security efforts, especially within the East African Community and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD).
Ugandan officials say the country’s military engagements in South Sudan have primarily focused on supporting stability efforts and protecting regional security interests.
The government maintains that the UPDF operates under clear legal frameworks and often works alongside regional partners to prevent the escalation of conflict.
Calls for Objective Investigations
Ugandan authorities have urged international bodies to ensure that investigations into conflicts are conducted objectively and based on verified evidence.
Officials say they remain open to engagement with international institutions but stress that reports must fairly reflect the facts and circumstances surrounding military operations.
The disagreement highlights the ongoing tension between international human rights monitoring bodies and governments involved in complex regional security missions across East Africa.
