Australia’s Prime Minister has strongly defended a new law that bans social media companies from allowing underage users on their platforms, despite pushback from teens who are finding ways to stay online.
The new law requires the 10 largest social media platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube, to block users under the age of 16 or face significant fines of up to A$49.5 million (about $33 million). The government said the move aims to protect young people from harmful content and online exploitation.
Critics, however, argue that the law could be difficult to enforce, as teens have already started to brag about finding ways to circumvent the restrictions, including using fake ages or setting up accounts under their parents’ names.
In response to these concerns, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defended the decision, stating that it was a necessary step to safeguard children in an increasingly digital world. “We cannot ignore the dangers that young people face on social media, including cyberbullying, exposure to harmful content, and online predators,” he said. “This law is in place to protect them.”
The government has acknowledged that it may take some time for social media companies to put the necessary systems in place to ensure underage users are effectively blocked from their platforms. However, authorities have made it clear that they expect companies to comply with the new rules as soon as possible.
This legislation is part of a broader effort by the Australian government to curb the influence of social media on the mental health and well-being of young people. In recent years, there have been increasing concerns about the impact of social media on teenagers, with studies linking excessive screen time to issues like depression, anxiety, and body image problems.
While some support the government’s move, others believe it will not fully solve the problem. Critics argue that the ban could drive young users to less regulated platforms or encourage them to use more deceptive means to access content.
Despite these challenges, the government remains firm in its stance, saying it will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the law and take further action if needed.
